Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Milton
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No arguments for this article's retention have been made. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Howard Milton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Nominated for an award is not the same as winning an award. Another ref is simply a quotation from the subject about something entirely different. Other refs make no mention. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 22:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I searched for anything under Howard Milton designer and found very little, nothing more than what's already cited, and that's pretty slim. I agree with deletion.RockyMtChai (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 12:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 12:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.